What Kind of Dinosaurs Are the Babies in the Book Gigantosaur

The class "Dinosauria" was originally divers past "Sir" Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842. In other words, the beingness of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head "coincidentally" in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, earlier a single dinosaur fossil had always been found. The Masonic media and mainstream printing worldwide got to piece of work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and and so lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found "proof" of Owen's theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years subsequently declared them to exist from an ancient extinct "Trachodon," dinosaur (which beyond ironically means "crude molar").

Firstly, information technology should be needless to say that it is impossible to reconstruct an entire hypothetical aboriginal animal based on a few teeth! But even more chiefly, information technology is dubious that a myriad of aboriginal reptile/bird and reptile/mammal transitional forms necessary for the blossoming theory of evolution, would be hypothesized and then conveniently "discovered" past teams of evolutionist archeologists purposely out looking to find such fossils! And it is even more dubious that such fossils have supposedly existed for millions of years simply were never found by or known to any civilization in the history of humanity until evolutionism'southward Masonic renaissance in the mid-19th century!

"Why are there no discoveries by native Americans in all the years previous when they roamed the American continents? There is no belief of dinosaurs in the Native American religion or tradition. For that matter, why were there no discoveries prior to the nineteenth century in whatever part of the earth? According to the World Book Encyclopedia, 'earlier the 1800'due south no 1 always knew that dinosaurs existed.' During the late 1800'south and early 1900'due south, big deposits of dinosaur remains were discovered …Why has man suddenly made all these discoveries?" -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction"

No tribes, cultures or countries in the globe always discovered a dinosaur os before the mid-1800s, and then they were suddenly found all over the globe in Northward America, Southward America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Argentina, Belgium, Mongolia, Tanzania, W Germany and many other places apparently had large deposits of dinosaur fossils never before seen. All these places were inhabited and well-explored for thousands of years earlier this time, why had no one ever establish a dinosaur fossil before?

Co-ordinate to the book, "The Dinosaur Project," paleontological journalist Wayne Grady claims the menstruation following this, from around 1870 to 1880 became "a period in North America where some of the almost underhanded shenanigans in the history of science were conducted." In what was known as "The Slap-up Dinosaur Rush" or "Bone Wars," Edward Drinker Cope of the Academy of Natural Sciences and Othniel Marsh of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, began a life-long rivalry and passion for "dinosaur hunting." They started out as friends but became bitter enemies during a legendary feud involving double-crossing, slander, bribery, theft, spying, and destruction of bones past both parties. Marsh is said to have discovered over 500 different ancient species including 80 dinosaurs, while Cope discovered 56. Out of the 136 dinosaur species supposedly discovered past the 2 men, yet, merely 32 are presently considered valid; the rest take all proven to exist falsifications and fabrications! None of them in one case claimed to notice a consummate skeleton either, and then all their work involved reconstructions. In fact, to this day no consummate skeleton has ever been plant, and so all dinosaurs are reconstructions.

"Discoveries and excavations seem non to be made past disinterested people, such as farmers, ranchers, hikers, outdoor recreationists, edifice construction industry basement excavators, pipeline trench diggers, and mining manufacture personnel but rather by people with vested interests, such as paleontologists, scientists, academy professors, and museum organization personnel who were intentionally looking for dinosaur bones or who have studied dinosaurs previously. The finds are often made during special dinosaur-bone hunting trips and expeditions past these people to far-away regions already inhabited and explored. This seems highly implausible. More believable is the instance of the discovery of the offset original Dead Ocean scrolls in 1947, which were unintentionally discovered by a child, and which were all published past 1955. In some cases of a discovery of dinosaur bones past a disinterested person, it was suggested to them by some 'professional' in the field to look or dig in a certain area. Too very interesting to note are special areas set aside and designated every bit dinosaur parks for which amateur dinosaur hunters are required to starting time obtain a dinosaur hunting license." -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Scientific discipline Fiction"

Whatever destination these establishment-funded archeologists and paleontologists set, information technology seemed they found incredible numbers of fossils in tiny areas. In one of the largest dinosaur digging sites, called the Ruth Mason Quarry, over 2,000 fossils were allegedly discovered. Casts and original skeletons assembled from these bones are currently on display in over 60 museums globe-wide. Florentino Ameghino, caput of paleontology at La Plata Museum is amazingly responsible for 6,000 fossil species supposedly discovered throughout his career all in Argentina. Dinosaur hunter Earl Douglass sent 350 tons of excavated "dinosaur" basic to the Carnegie Museum of Natural History throughout his career, all coming from the "Dinosaur National Monument" in Utah. During an expedition to Patagonia, Dr. Luis Chiappe and Dr. Lowell Dingus supposedly discovered thousands of dinosaur eggs at a site of but a few hundred square yards. Many experts have mentioned how such finds of huge quantities of fossils in 1 area, by just a few highly-invested individuals, goes against the laws of natural probability and lends credence to the likelihood of forgeries or concentrated planting efforts.

"'Dinosaur' bones sell for a lot of money at auctions. Information technology is a assisting business. There is pressure for academics to publish papers. Museums are in the business concern of producing displays that are popular and appealing. Pic producers and the media demand to produce cloth to sell to stay in concern. The mainstream media loves to hype alleged dinosaurs finds. Much is to exist gained by converting a bland not-dinosaur discovery, of a bone of modern origin, into an impressive dinosaur find, and letting artists' interpretations and imaginations take the spotlight, rather than the basic boring real find. There are people who desire and crave prestige, fame and attention. There is the bandwagon effect and oversupply behaviour. And then at that place are people and entities pursuing political and religious agendas. Highly rewarding fiscal and economical benefits to museums, educational and research organizations, university departments of paleontology, discoverers and owners of dinosaur basic, and the book, television, motion-picture show, and media industries may crusade sufficient motivations for ridiculing of open questioning and for suppression of honest investigation." -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Scientific discipline or Science Fiction".

The fact that "T-Male monarch" bones have sold at auctions for upwards of $12 million shows how lucrative the field of dinosaur-hunting can exist, and it just happens to be Museum officials who serendipitously seem to brand the about prolific finds! The kickoff dinosaur to ever be publicly displayed was the "Hadrosaurus foulkii," at Edward Drinker Cope'south Academy of Natural Sciences in Philidelphia. The bones were co-discovered by Joseph Leidy, Cope's esteemed professor, and the man responsible for the "Trachodon" toothosaurus. The original Hadrosaurus reconstruction, which is yet on display today, shows a huge plaster cast bipedal reptile standing upright using its tail every bit a 3rd-leg. What few people know, however, is that no skull was ever discovered and no original bones were put in the public showroom.

"A visual and a sculptural creative person were promptly hired to invent a skull, and from the illustrations of another artist, who had depicted the Iguanadon, the two artists drew the same face up for the Hadrosaurus foulkii. The people involved could now technically defend the being of this dinosaur, if someone were to enquire. The stunt worked out so well, and fooled the public so thoroughly, that they could later change the head of the creature without anyone noticing. To this day, Hadrosaurus foulkii is on display at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia. The basic are said to be kept backside heavy, closed doors, simply a plaster copy is exhibited in their identify … And then we learn of an iguana skull existence substituted for the skull of a dinosaur on display. Was the public told at the fourth dimension? What are we non being told today?" -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Scientific discipline Fiction"

What nosotros are not beingness told is that this is the rule and the not the exception. To this day not a single complete skeleton of any dinosaur has ever been found! All the museum displays, models, mannequins, cartoons, and movies of prehistoric monsters you have ever seen are all imaginative reconstructions based on incomplete skeletons arranged in a mode paleontologists believe to be most realistic. Furthermore, the skeletons exhibited in museums are all admittedly intricate fabrications fabricated of plaster, fiberglass, various epoxies, and other animal bones, non original fossils.

When "dinosaur" bones are transported and prepared they apply strips of burlap soaked in plaster to jacket over the fossils. Then afterwards applying a tissue separator to continue the plaster from direct contact with the bone, the soaked burlap strips are laid on until it is totally encased in a protective mummy-similar blanket fix for rubber transport. In an article titled "A Fossil's Trail From Excavation to Exhibit" ane insider remarked that, "Through moldmaking and casting nosotros can totally fabricate limbs, ribs, vertebrae, etc., for the missing pieces of an articulated skeletal mount. Plaster, fiberglass and epoxies are often and commonly used. In reconstruction work on single basic, small-scale to large cracks can exist filled in with mache or plaster mixed with dextrin, a starch that imparts an adhesive quality and actress hardness to regular molding plaster. Nosotros've also had success using epoxy putties. Big missing fragments tin can exist sculpted directly in place with these aforementioned materials." In other words, Museum personnel work with plaster and other materials to transport and fabricate skeletons and missing or incomplete bones all the time. In fact, the huge "dinosaur bone" displays found in museums across the world are absolutely advisedly prepared fakes! No independent researcher has ever examined a real dinosaur skull! They merits all the actual fossils are kept in loftier-security storage, simply only a select few paleontologists are ever allowed to examine them, and so the power to ascertain their authenticity is kept from the general public.

"Most people believe that dinosaur skeletons displayed in museums consist of real dinosaur bones. This is not the case. The existent bones are incarcerated in thick vaults to which only a select few highly placed researchers concur a key, which means that NO contained researcher has ever handled a tyrannosaurus male monarch os. When people unaffiliated with the paleontological establishment attempt to gain access in order to study these dinosaur bones, they are met with refusal upon refusal … Only around 2100 dinosaur basic sets have been discovered worldwide, and out of these, only 15 incomplete Tyrannosaurus Rex bone sets take been found. These dinosaur bone sets have never formed a complete skeleton, but from these incomplete bones sets, paleontologists have constructed a hypothesis almost the appearance of the whole skeleton, which they take modeled in plastic. If thousands of longnecks and large cannibal reptiles had really roamed Globe, we wouldn't only have institute 2100 dinosaur bone sets, but millions of bones, with ordinary people tripping over them when digging in their vegetable patches." -Robbin Koefoed, "The Dinosaurs Never Existed"

"When children get to a dinosaur museum, are the displays they come across displays of science or displays of art and science fiction? Are we existence deceived and brainwashed at an early age into believing a dinosaur myth? Deep probing questions need to exist asked of the entire dinosaur business. There may accept been an ongoing effort since the earliest dinosaur 'discoveries' to plant, mix and match bones of diverse animals, such equally crocodiles, alligators, iguanas, giraffes, elephants, cattle, kangaroos, ostriches, emus, dolphins, whales, rhinoceroses, etc. to construct and create a new human being-fabricated concept prehistoric brute called the dinosaur. Where bones from existing animals are not satisfactory for charade purposes, plaster substitutes may be manufactured and used. Some textile similar or superior to plasticine clay or plaster of Paris would exist suitable. Molds may besides be employed. What would be the motivation for such a deceptive endeavor? Obvious motivations include trying to prove evolution, trying to disprove or cast doubtfulness on the Christian Bible and the beingness of the Christian God, and trying to disprove the 'young-earth theory.' The dinosaur concept implies that if God exists, He tinkered with His idea of dinosaurs for awhile, then probably discarded or became tired of this creation and then went on to create man. The presented dinosaur historical timeline suggests an imperfect God who came up with the idea of homo equally an afterthought, thus demoting the biblical idea that God created man in His own image." -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction"

Type "Dinosaur Skulls" into a search engine and you will observe a variety of replicas, tailor fabricated dinosaurs, and "museum-quality" skeletons. 1 of the largest and almost-renowned suppliers of fake dinosaurs is the Zigong Dino Body of water Fine art Visitor in Sichuan, China which provides natural history museums worldwide with ultra-realistic dinosaur skeletons made from real bones! Chicken, frog, dog, cat, horse and grunter'due south bones are melted down, mixed with mucilage, resin and plaster, then used as base textile for re-casting as "dinosaur bones." They are even given intentional fractures and an antiquated/fossilized look to achieve the right outcome. Their website boasts, "Over 62% of our output goes to American and European markets, which means we will understand and are familiar with the intricacies and regulation of exporting to these regions … Since we are a partner of Dinosaur Museums, all products are made under the guidance of experts of the Chinese Academy of Sciences … Nosotros accept gained a global sales network reaching the The states, Brazil, French republic, Poland, Russia, Deutschland, Kingdom of saudi arabia, South korea, Thailand, Indonesia, exhibited in Peru, Argentina, Vancouver, Cincinnati, Chicago and other places."

"I have heard there is a fake-fossil factory in northeast China, in Liaoning Province, near the deposits where many of these recent alleged feather dinosaurs were establish." -Alan Feduccia, University of Due north Carolina Paleontology Professor

"The possibility exists that key dinosaur bones on display have been artificially modified through sculpture and carving. Bone sculpture is not an unknown human activity. Many cultures participate in creating man-fabricated objects out of existing bones, totally unrecognizable from the original shape. Is the dinosaur industry a customer of this sort of business? Is it possible that dinosaur skeleton replica are secretly assembled or manufactured in individual buildings out of public view, with bones artificially constructed or used from a number of different modern-day animals? Why bother having any authentic original fossils at all if alleged replicas please the public?" -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Scientific discipline Fiction"

Another problem with dinosaurs is their unnatural structural dynamics. Many dinosaur skeletons and reconstructions feature bipedal monsters like the T-King with a forward-leaning torso and head far larger and heavier than its counter-balancing tail. Many museum displays cannot fifty-fifty stand nether their own weight; it is highly unlikely that beasts this large and disproportionate could exist at all. The loads acting on their skeletons are so great that calculations signal the bones of the largest dinosaurs would buckle and crack under their own immense weight! Experts take also pointed out that dinosaurs would have to take moved much slower than portrayed in movies to preclude sudden shocks to their skeletons.

"This idea of slow moving animals does not agree with the bio-mechanical analysis of dinosaurs, which indicate that the Dinosaurs were agile, active creatures. This is the paradox between the Dinosaurs size and lifestyle. Many displays and drawings of dinosaurs announced to be an absurdity, showing a two-legged animal that would be totally off-balance, with the weight of head and abdomen much greater than weight of tail, which is supposed to act as a counter-balance. Is the dinosaur industry a case of science trying to run across public desires or expectations? The movie Jurassic Park is an example of showing dinosaurs much larger than any current displays in museums. Subsequently the movie came out, it is interesting to note that many articles were written request 'Is this possible?' I can remember a study of dinosaur DNA being discovered preserved in amber, which later turned out to exist false." -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction"

"Overall, several millions of dollars take been spent promoting the existence of dinosaurs through movies, TV, magazines and comics. The world of movies and paleontology are like Siamese twins. People's view on the existence of dinosaurs is based non on business firm evidence, but on Hollywood fixated artistic impressions. Documentaries colorfully illustrate each dinosaur's characteristics, like colors, weight and muscle mass, just Don Lessem (advisor for Jurassic Park) admits that this is pure guesswork – consider for case the question of how much these dinosaurs weigh. Don Lessem says, 'Scientists don't know how much dinosaurs weighed!'" -Robbin Koefoed, "The Dinosaurs Never Existed"

Dinosaurs are presented to the public with colorful artistic reconstructions, drawings, models, mannequins, gigantic skeletons in museums, cartoons and movies showing these beasts in explicit particular, only the fact is from the assigning and arrangement of bones in each species, to the impossible to discern soft tissue, skin, eyes, noses, color, hairyness, texture etc., only like the many supposed Ape-Man species, all dinosaur reconstructions are 100% fictional fabrications created by invested and inventive evolutionists. They purposely nowadays dinosaurs to children in the media to spark and bias their young imaginations towards their machinations. Cartoons like "Ice Age" and "The Country Before Time," movies similar "Jurassic Park" and "Dinosaur Island," coloring books, dolls, plastic toys, elementary school textbooks, and huge displays in children's museums certainly take an effect on budding young minds.

National Geographic and the Ice Historic period movies were produced by Mason Rupert Murdoch'south News Corp. and 20th Century Trick. The Masonic production visitor Universal Studios created Jurassic Park and The Land Before Fourth dimension. They are owned by Comcast, whose master shareholders are Masons JP Morgan and the Rothschilds. Discovery Channel which features many dinosaur documentaries is also financially advised by North M Rothschild and Sons Limited.

Former Paleontology student Michael Forsell claimed on a radio interview with leading paleontologist Jack Horner, that he was "a total fraud, fabricating testify and perpetuating the myth of dinosaurs." He continued on saying, "I started my career in the field of paleontology, only to leave my studies once I realized the whole thing was a sham. It's nonsense, most of the so-called skeletons in museums are actually plaster casts. They even practice it openly on documentaries at present, preserving the bones my donkey! I struggled every bit a student, mainly because I could not tell the divergence between a fossilized egg and an ordinary stone, and of course there is no difference. I was treated like a leper when I refused to buy into their propaganda, and promptly left the course. Dinosaurs never existed, the whole shebang is a freak evidence, they only grab a couple of one-time basic and class them into their latest Frankenstein's monster-like showroom. If dinosaurs existed they would be mentioned in the Bible. Nosotros are all being fooled and it'southward incorrect, but together we can stop information technology."

Many claim that since dinosaur fossils have been radiometrically dated to be tens of millions of years old that their authenticity is thus proven. The fact is, however, that the methods used to appointment dinosaur fossils involve non measuring the bodily fossils, only the rocks nearly where they are establish. Most fossils are institute most the surface of the globe, and if a mod-day animal were to die in the area, paleontologists would exist likely to engagement them the same historic period! Dr. Margaret Helder in her book "Completing the Picture, A Handbook on Museums and Interpretive Centers Dealing with Fossils," she writes, "Scientists used to be very impressed with the potential of radiometric for coming upward with absolutely reliable ages of some kinds of rocks. They practice not feel that fashion anymore. Having had to deal with numerous calculated dates which are as well young or too quondam compared with what they expected, scientists now admit that the procedure has many more uncertainties than they e'er would have supposed in the early years. The public knows almost nothing about uncertainties in the dating of rocks. The impression that most people accept received is that many rocks on world are extremely former and that the technology exists to make accurate measurements of the ages. Scientists have become more than and more than aware however that the measurements which the machines brand, may tell us nada nigh the actual age of the rock."

Ane of the principal reasons that evolutionists "needed" the existence of dinosaurs was to answer the complicated problems present in the theory of evolution including: body of water-dwelling animals evolving into state-dwellers; reptiles evolving wings, feathers, flight and becoming birds; besides as other reptiles evolving warm-blood, live births, breasts and condign mammals. Through their imaginary multi-million-year timeline and a variety of supposed transitional dinosaur forms, the paleontological establishment has been promoting various sea-dinosaur, reptile/birds and reptile/mammals to bridge these gaps. Many professionals and experts in the field have disputed such findings equally often as they have been presented, however. Dr. Storrs Olson, a Smithsonian Plant Scientist, wrote, "The thought of feathered dinosaurs and the theropod origin of birds is being actively promulgated by a core of zealous scientists acting in concert with certain editors at Nature and National Geographic who themselves take become outspoken and highly biased proselytizers of the faith. Truth and careful scientific weighing of evidence have been among the outset casualties in their program, which is now fast condign 1 of the grander scientific hoaxes or our age ."

No authentic feathers have ever been found with dinosaur fossils, though a few exposed hoaxes certainly attempted to imitation it. Dr. Olson chosen the adding of feathers to their findings "hype, wishful thinking, propaganda, nonsense fantasia, and a hoax." In the 1990s many fossils with feathers were supposedly discovered in Cathay (suspiciously shut to the Zigong Dino Ocean Art Company), just when examined Dr. Timothy Rowe found the so-called "Confuciusornis" was an elaborate hoax. He also found the "Archeoraptor" supposedly discovered in the 90s was composed of bones from 5 different animals! When Dr. Rowe presented his findings to National Geographic the head scientist reportedly remarked "well all of these have been fiddled with!" National Geographic then proceeded with their news conferences and media stories well-nigh the Archeoraptor fossils existence 18-carat and having found the missing link in development.

"In 1999, National Geographic magazine was busted when they presented, in a colorful and fancily presented commodity, the missing link. An Archeoraptor dinosaur, which was supposed to support the basic tenet of evolutionary theory, that dinosaurs had slowly developed over millions of years. Their proof consisted of a fossil, where carefully arranged bone imprints gave the impression of a creature half dinosaur and half bird. The scam was discovered during a CT scan which uncovered unnatural bone links. National Geographic magazine was afterwards forced to admit, when pressured, that the fossil was man-made!" -Robbin Koefoed, "The Dinosaurs Never Existed"

Paleontologists merits that "Archaeopteryx" is another transitional form of bird evolved from dinosaurs, merely this theory falls on its face confronting overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Other species like Confuciusornis, Liaoningornis, and Eoalulavis have all been found to be contemporary with the Archaeopteryx and are indistinguishable from nowadays-twenty-four hour period birds. Alan Feduccia from Academy of North Carolina, 1 of the near famous ornithologists in the world stated, "I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don't see any similarities whatsoever. I just don't see it. The theropod origins of birds, in my opinion, will be the greatest embarrassment of paleontology of the 20th century." Larry Martin from the University of Kansas, a paleo-ornithologist says, "to tell you the truth, if I had to support the dinosaur origin of birds with those characters, I'd be embarrassed every time I had to get up and talk about information technology."

Even if dinosaurs did evolve into birds to fill their evolution gap, it does not explain how something like the common housefly could have evolved. Flies flap their wings simultaneously 500 times per second, even the slightest dissonance in vibration would cause them to lose balance and fall, merely this never happens. How could they "evolve" such an amazing and specialized ability? Why were dinosaurs never discovered before the evolutionist renaissance in the mid-19th century? Why do paleontologists think they tin can reconstruct an entire species of ancient fauna from a few teeth? Why take and then many dinosaur "discoveries" turned out to be hoaxes? Why are all "authentic dinosaur fossils" kept under tight lock and key away from any independent assay? Why has erosion and weathering not destroyed all these supposed prints and fossils that are allegedly millions of years old? If dinosaurs were supposedly wiped out past a meteor impact or other such global catastrophe, why is it that all the other diverse animal species that be today were not similarly wiped out? At that place are many more questions which demand to be answered before anyone in their correct-mind should consider the existence of dinosaurs anything only a user-friendly evolutionist myth.

"The paleontological establishment can control which hypotheses will exist constructed through textbooks and the curriculum. In this way, students are brainwashed into a pseudo-reality controlled by the text material and the teacher's authority. A short practical example; a random dental bone is found at an excavation site and from this dental bone, the rest of the skeleton is guessed at. We are not kidding most this. The entire dinosaurian field of the paleontological program is a sham." -Robbin Koefoed, "The Dinosaurs Never Existed"

"During the nineteenth century a new earth view of development was existence pursued past then influential people such as Darwin and Marx. During this era of thought the beginning dinosaur discoveries were made. Were these discoveries 'fabricated' to try to make upwards for inadequacies in the fossil record for the theory of evolution? The post-obit issues raise ruby flags as to the integrity of the dinosaur manufacture and cast doubts as to whether dinosaurs ever existed: (one) dinosaur discoveries having occurred but within the last 2 centuries and in huge unusual concentrated quantities going against the laws of nature and probability; (2) dinosaur discoverers typically and generally not being disinterested parties without a vested interest; (3) the nature of public brandish preparation, calling into question the integrity and source of fossils, and assuasive for the possibility of tampering and os commutation, and the possibility of fraudulent activities on a systemic basis; (4) existing creative drawings and public exhibits showing off-residual and bad-mannered postures that bones physics would rule out as existence possible; (v) very low odds of all these dinosaur bones being fossilized but relatively few bones of other animals; (6) implications of dinosaur discoveries to the theory of evolution and the conventionalities that homo was created in God'southward image, suggesting possible hidden and subtle political or religious agendas served on a naive and unsuspecting public; and, (vii) a lack of funding for organizations and people questioning or existence skeptical of each and every discovery and public display.  The possibility exists that living dinosaurs never existed. The dinosaur industry should be investigated and questions demand to be asked. I am unaware of whatever evidence or reason for absolutely believing dinosaurs ever were alive on earth. The possibility exists that the concept of prehistoric living dinosaurs has been a fabrication of nineteenth and twentieth century people possibly pursuing an evolutionary and anti-Bible, anti-Christian agenda. Questioning what is being told instead is a better choice rather than blindly believing the dinosaur story. 'O Timothy, go along that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called.' (1 Timothy half-dozen:twenty). The selection between believing the word of man, the evolutionists, or the word of God, the Bible, is a affair of religion." -David Wozney, "Dinosaurs: Science or Scientific discipline Fiction"

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

ogleshitery.blogspot.com

Source: https://ericdubay.wordpress.com/2018/07/08/dinosaurs-never-existed/

0 Response to "What Kind of Dinosaurs Are the Babies in the Book Gigantosaur"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel